Refurbishing large non-return valves should reduce risk, not create it. But change the closing time on a 72-inch valve and you can aggravate reverse pump rotation, raising the risk of excessive shaft torque, valve torque, and motor overcurrent, potentially taking out every pump and forcing a multi-week plant shutdown.
That is exactly what Sasol faced during a valve refurbishment project on a petrochemical cooling water system: five pumps, 100,000 m3/h (440,000 gpm) of flow, and a narrow window between too fast and too slow.
On September 8, Trey Walters, Principal, R&D at Datacor, and Nelius Joubert, Principal Process Engineer at Sasol, walked through the full analysis live. Access to the full recording is above.
Sasol's cooling water system supplies 100,000 m3/h (440,000 gpm) at 450 kPa through five pumps and 72-inch hydraulically actuated non-return valves, with surge tower protection in place. A valve refurbishment project raised a critical question: would a new valve closure time protect the system, or introduce new risk?
Using Datacor Impulse (formerly AFT Impulse), the team modeled valve closure times from 4 to 40 seconds, calibrated against real field pressure data, motor current readings, and pump stopping times. Four-quadrant pump modeling captured what happens during a pump trip, including reverse flow and reverse rotation, rather than assuming the pump simply coasts to a stop.
If your plant has pumps that trip, valves that close, or a shutdown scenario you have never modeled, the questions Sasol answered apply to you too. Datacor Impulse is built to find the answers before they show up in the field.