Pressure waves can hammer a piping run far harder than steady-state calcs suggest. In this peer-reviewed ASME 2022 paper, two AFT engineers walk through six real-world layouts and prove where the math matters most. Their Acceleration Reaction method matches component-level results within 1 lbf, while a popular “Endpoint Pressure” shortcut missed by more than 50× in a high-viscosity line (16,649 lbf vs 328 lbf). Download the paper, copy the worked examples, and tighten your next stress report with data you can trust.
-
See six tested scenarios—water, crude oil, glycol, and steam systems.
-
Spot shortcuts that backfire—Endpoint Pressure method can over- or under-shoot peak loads by orders of magnitude.
-
Use one clear equation grounded in Newton’s Second Law—not black-box software assumptions.
-
Match forces within 1 %—Acceleration and Component Reaction methods agree to the lbf.
-
Cover both liquids and gases with examples that span 75 °F water to superheated steam.
-
Copy-and-paste tables showing max/min reactions for every case.
-
Avoid over-designed supports by replacing estimates with verified numbers.
-
Rely on ASME-vetted research—no vendor fluff, just conference-grade proof.