AuditCommand
-
Closes the equipment audit trail gaps behind FDA Form 483 observations with a defensible record.
-
Equipment audit trails from HMIs, instruments, skids, and DCS systems land in one view.
-
Audit trail records are assembled as production runs, ready when the batch finishes.
-
Equipment data is collected automatically, the same way, from every connected system.
One automated system for collection, routing, and approval
Connects directly to equipment: HMIs, skids, instruments, DCS systems, historians with out-of-the-box connectors to eliminate custom scripting. Your data stays on-premise.
Validation rules turn raw equipment data into audit trail documentation reviewers can read. Records are generated automatically at batch completion.
Records route for role-based review, annotation, and signature. Every action logs with a timestamp and user identity. Approved records live in one compliant repository.
Built from the ground up for regulated manufacturing
Data Collection & Unification
Connects directly to existing automation systems: equipment skids, HMIs, instruments, DCS, historians. Extracts audit trail data without requiring a centralized data lake or cloud platform.
Automatic Report Generation
Data Transformation
Review and Approval Routing
CFR Part 11 Compliance
Configurable Report Scope
Why Choose AuditCommand?
Operates at the Automation Layer
Runs close to the OT layer, processing data at the source. Eliminates latency, reduces integration complexity, and avoids moving regulated manufacturing data off-premise.
End-to-End Audit System
Eliminates Custom Scripting
Extensive Equipment Library
Developed for GMP
Reduced Validation Scope
Equipment Audit Trail Management
Equipment Integration and Data Acquisition
AuditCommand connects at the automation layer and reads audit trail data directly from the equipment already on your floor. New or legacy, no equipment is out of scope.
- Direct connections to skids, HMIs, instruments, DCS systems, and historians
- Real-time synchronization across devices, so events from separate systems line up on one timeline
- Connections built against your equipment list, including older systems with no native export
- No data lake, no cloud platform, no custom scripting
- Regulated data stays on premise
Review Workflow and Approval Management
Route every event, or only the exceptions that need attention. You define the review scope.
- Risk-based and exception-based review, configurable by equipment, batch, or event type
- Full-event routing where complete review is required
- Role-based routing with annotation, escalation, and multi-stage approval
- Records generate automatically at batch completion or on a defined schedule
- Real-time status across every batch in review
Compliance and Data Integrity
Records are built to hold up under inspection. So is the review process itself.
- 21 CFR Part 11 compliant electronic signatures and record handling
- Every review action logged with timestamp and user identity
- AuditCommand maintains its own audit trail of all review and approval activity
- Role-based access control across review and approval stages
- Approved records centralized in one auditable repository
Validation, Architecture, and Deployment
GAMP 5 Category 4. Configured, not custom, with a revalidation scope your team can manage.
- Classified as a GAMP 5 Category 4 configured product
- Software is pretested before deployment
- Datacor supplies supporting documentation for your validation process
- On-premise architecture at the automation layer, with no cloud dependency
-
Scales from a single manufacturing area to multi-site deployment
Add-on Modules
Engineering extension tools that can help you quickly and efficiently complete projects. Modules can work individually or together within Fathom and your existing Fathom models.
Models the effects of pumping fluids containing settling solids using the Wilson/GIW method. Used with either Fathom or Impulse.
Identifies input parameters that yield desired output values and simulates control functions. Used with either Fathom or Arrow.
Models dynamic system behavior in steady-state flow and how critical system parameters vary over time. Used with either Fathom or Arrow.
Evaluates the complex interaction of system variables to reveal combinations of cost savings. Used with either Fathom or Arrow.
The Chempak add-on utility provides a thermophysical database of almost 700 liquids and 600 gases with mixing capability.
Helps identify pipe acoustical frequencies to avoid resonance from excitation, especially in systems with positive displacement pumps and reciprocating compressors. Used with either Impulse or xStream
Integrations
Connect AuditCommand to the equipment and systems already running on your floor, with no new infrastructure and no custom development.
Read audit trail data directly from skids, HMIs, instruments, and PLCs at the automation layer.
Pull from process historians, SQL sources, and file-based exports without a data lake or cloud platform.
Capture audit trail data from cleanroom, HVAC, water, and environmental monitoring systems alongside production equipment.
No equipment is out of scope. Datacor builds connections against your equipment list, including older systems with no native export.
Potential Results
Explore Customer Stories
Time engineers spend pulling audit data from equipment, returned to engineering work.
Automated collection removes the manual errors that drive review findings.
Records are waiting at batch completion instead of being assembled by hand afterward.
Built for Regulated Manufacturing Teams
Designed for manufacturers who are still pulling audit trail data from equipment by hand.
Your team can now access get one unbroken, defensible record from equipment to approval, ready for inspection with zero audit trail observations.
FAQ
Do we need a data lake or cloud platform?
No. AuditCommand operates at the automation layer and processes data at the source. Regulated manufacturing data stays on-premise, which avoids both latency and the data governance exposure of moving records off-site.
Will we need custom scripting or integration development?
Does Audit Command replace our MES, historian, or ERP?
Is Audit Command 21 CFR Part 11 compliant?
How does the review and approval workflow work?
What is our revalidation burden?
Can we control what appears in a report?
How does this reduce inspection risk?
Can it scale across multiple sites?